SQLitening Support Forum

General => General Board => Topic started by: dmtulsa on April 26, 2011, 09:08:59 AM

Title: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: dmtulsa on April 26, 2011, 09:08:59 AM
I'm surprised this hasn't been asked already, maybe its too stupid of a question, but are there any plans to have SQLitening as an SLL for PowerBasic 10. I no an SLL is not needed. I was just wondering.

Are there any issues using PB 10 with SQLitening? I haven't seen any comments here about it.

Thank you
Doug
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Rolf Brandt on April 26, 2011, 09:24:23 AM
I had thought of that too.
For the client side SLL won't be bad. The server side could stay the way it is.
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: dmtulsa on April 26, 2011, 10:05:41 AM
I agree, I don't see any reason for the server side to change. It would just make the client side a little cleaner just to have a single .exe

Thanks
Doug
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Gary Stout on April 26, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
I am not really up on SLL's yet, but since the SQLitening source code is provided, is there any reason why one couldn't create their own SLL from the source?

Maybe I have missed the big picture.... :)

Gary
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Rolf Brandt on April 26, 2011, 02:00:28 PM
You can also easily modify the source files to use them as include files.
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Fred Meier on April 26, 2011, 04:19:00 PM
I don't have PB10 yet (waiting for 10.01).  When I get it and become proficient with SLL's I will post an opinion.  I don't believe there should be any problem using SQLitneing with PB10.
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Jim Dunn on April 26, 2011, 08:34:39 PM
But you would still need the SQLITE.DLL, right?

So, you wouldn't have "just the exe" on the client side...

So maybe we don't need an SLL ??
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Rolf Brandt on April 27, 2011, 02:26:24 AM
You don't need Sqlite.dll on the client side in a C/S environment, it is only needed on the server side.
Zlib.dll though would be needed on both sides.
Title: Re: Any Plans to have SQLitening as an SLL
Post by: Fred Meier on June 14, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
I have been using PB10 for a few weeks and do not think a SQLitening.Sll would be appropriate for the follow reasons:

1.  You would still need the following Dll's in your application:
      SQLite3.Dll if running local
      SQLitiningClient.Dll if running remote
      SQLiteningAuxRuts.Dll if compressing or encrypting
      SQLiteningZLib.Dll if compressing or running remote
      SQLiteningS.Dll or SQLiteningU.Dll if not using PowerBasic

2.  Using a Sll will increase your compile times slightly

3.  A Sll would not be backwards compatible. I would have to maintain both a Dll and a Sll.

4.  If required, you are able to create a Sll using the SQLitening.Bas source.